Bible & The Arts
Biblical Commentaries
Biblical Languages
Hebrew Bible / Old Testament
History of the Biblical Period
Journals
Literature of the Bible
New Testament
Theology of the Bible
Bible Bibliographies
Bible in the Modern World
Biblical Reception
Classic Reprints
Dictionary of Classical Hebrew
Earth Bible Commentary
Hebrew Bible Monographs
Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism
New Testament Monographs
Pericope
Readings: A New Biblical Commentary
Recent Research in Biblical Studies
Text of the Hebrew Bible
The Social World of Biblical Antiquity, First Series
The Social World of Biblical Antiquity, Second Series
Click here for titles coming soon...
Click here to view the latest titles
Click here to view the complete catalogue
Search Books & Journals
About Us
For Authors
For Customers
Contact Us
Facebook





x + 127 pp.

£18.50 / $29.50 / €24.50
Paperback





Guide to Biblical Chronology
Antti Laato

This Guide to Biblical Chronology aims to explain why different chronological proposals exist for the reigns of kings of Israel and Judah and how the conflicting chronological data preserved in the Books of Kings have come into being.

The first step is to reconstruct older chronological data so that synchronisms are in harmony with each other. Only then can the chronological data be related to extrabiblical documents; such a comparison reveals a good degree of correspondence. This means that the chronological records of the kings of Judah and Israel during the period between 930 and 586 BCE must have based on reliable annalistic records from royal archives.

After the destruction of Samaria, synchronic chronological presentations of the history of Judah and Israel were composed and the Deuteronomistic editors used them. They drew their own conclusions from the source material and created a chronology of their own, which sometimes led to the contradictions we can detect in the present form of the Hebrew Bible.

Another important result is that the 480-year period mentioned in 1 Kings 6 and the 300-year period in Judges 11 are also based on the pre-Deuteronomistic chronological tradition even though they are not based on archival material and are therefore unreliable figures.

The Guide to Biblical Chronology also deals with postbiblical Jewish chronology, showing that there were in existence two different and competing chronological systems. One was based on Daniel 9.24-27 and followed by Josephus, and the other was first advanced by Demetrius the Chronographer in the late third century BCE and was then followed in the Damascus Document from Qumran and in Second Baruch.


Antti Laato is Professor of Old Testament Exegesis and Judaism at Åbo Akademi University, Finland.

978-1-909697-84-3 paperback
Publication September 2015

Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
   Why This Book?
   The Methodological Procedure
   The Content of This Book
   Chronology for the Kings of Israel and Judah
   Albright’s Chronology
   Thiele’s Chronology
   Begrich’s and Jepsen’s Chronology
   Hayes’s and Hooker’s Chronology
   Hughes’s Chronology
   Galil’s Chronology
   Four Preliminary Questions
   The New Year
   Accession-Year or Non-Accession-Year System
   Co-regency as an Explanation Model
   Text-Critical Considerations Combined with Other Speculations

2. THE CHRONOLOGICAL DATA OF THE ISRAELITE AND JUDEAN KINGS
   Synchronisms and Royal Archives
   The Biblical Synchronisms of the Israelite and Judean Kings
   The Challenge of Extra-Biblical Documents to the Biblical
      Chronological System

3. RELIABILITY OF THE SYNCHRONIC TRADITION OF THE ISRAELITE AND JUDEAN KINGS
   Do We Have a Reliable Tradition for the Biblical Chronology on the
      Reigns of Kings?
   The Case of Uzziah 1 = Jeroboam II
   The Case of Omri’s Dynasty
   The Case of Pekah
   Summary

4. THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE LAST JUDEAN KINGS
   The Evidence of the Babylonian Chronicle
   The Double Dating in Ezekiel 1.1-3 and the Last Kings of Judah

5. THE ABSOLUTE BIBLICAL CHRONOLOGY OF THE BOOKS OF KINGS
   Constructed Chronology and its Historical Relevance
   The Invasion of Shishak
   The Battle of Qarqar
   The Tribute of Jehu
   The Tribute of Jehoash
   The Possible Tribute of Azariah/Uzziah
   The Tribute of Menahem
   The Contact of Ahaz to Tiglat-Pileser III
   The Dethronement of Pekah and the Accession of Hosea
   The Destruction of Samaria
   The Invasion of Sennacherib
   The Forced Labor Tribute of Manasseh to Esarhaddon
   The Death of Josiah
   The Battle of Carchemish
   The First Conquest of Jerusalem
   The Destruction of Jerusalem
   Conclusions: Literacy in Israel
   Seals in Archaeological Excavations
   Monumental Inscriptions
   Early Literary Texts
   Biblical Sources
   Abecedaries

6. THE POSTBIBLICAL CHRONOLOGY AND THE SEVENTY YEAR-WEEKS IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL
   Inaccurate Chronology in the Second Temple Period
   The Chronology of Josephus
   The Chronology of Demetrius
   The Chronology in the Damascus Document
   The Chronology in Second Baruch
   The Outcome of the Chronological System in Daniel 9.24-27

7. THE DEUTERONOMISTIC CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EARLY ISRAEL

8. THE PRIESTLY CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FROM
   ANNO MUNDI TO THE PATRIARCHS


9. CONCLUSIONS


Reviews
The slim volume is a competent introduction to the thorny field of biblical chronology and a welcome addition to the collection of basic tools for the student of Hebrew Scriptures. The introduction reviews previous chronologies from Albright (1945) to Galil (1996). Contradictions within the biblical data found creative responses within this scholarly tradition, some of which might look a bit too creative from the present point of view. The introduction concludes with the presentation of four problem areas that require decisions before a biblical chronology can be compiled: the date of the New Year in Israel and Judah; the question of the accession year; the question of co-regencies (never mentioned in the Bible with the exception of David and Solomon [1 Kgs 1:1–2:10] and Uzziah and Jotham [2 Kgs 15:5] but frequently assumed in previous chronologies); and the textual evidence, especially discrepancies between the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint. Ernst Axel Knauf, Review of Biblical Literature.